Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 23.06.2025 01:02

Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Daniel Jones touts "productive spring" in learning, understanding Colts offense - NBC Sports
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thank you.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Asia stocks buoyed by tech gains; trade, economic uncertainty persists - Investing.com
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Democrats be honest, how many of you were wishing that Musk rescue space flight blew up?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
—— indirects on kuorans, irl and idols
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Can you provide a list of cities named after animals and the animals they were named after?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
How can I remove decimals in math?
Just in the last 5 years:
Russia can stop this any time.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.